PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-82751 ZenHive CVE debrief
CVE-2026-82751 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for provisioning an access key on the client's own account. This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1. The server sponsors Tempo payments, MPP.Methods.Tempo.FeePayerPolicy.measure/3 in lib/mpp/methods/tempo/fee_payer_policy.ex bounds the gas fields, the fee budget, the validity window and the access list of the client-signed 0x76 envelope, but does not check whether the envelope carries the optional key_authorization field. A client can attach a fully signed key authorization, provisioning a new access key with token spending limits on its own account, alongside the normal payment call. The key and each limit entry are persistent storage writes billed as intrinsic gas to the sponsor, bounded only by the gas_limit ceiling. At the reporter's default of one key with three token limits the sponsored cost rises from about 46,587 gas to about 1,808,700 gas, and the client keeps a valid access key it paid nothing for.
- Vendor
- ZenHive
- Product
- mpp
- CVSS
- HIGH 8.3
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-06
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-06
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-06
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-06
Who should care
Defenders responsible for ZenHive mpp deployments, particularly those using sponsored payments, should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. Defenders should prioritize verifying and remediating this vulnerability in ZenHive mpp versions from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1, as it allows for potential gas cost inflation and unauthorized access key provisioning.
Why it matters
Defenders should prioritize verifying and remediating this vulnerability in ZenHive mpp versions from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1, as it allows for potential gas cost inflation and unauthorized access key provisioning.
- Potential for significant gas cost inflation
- Unauthorized access key provisioning
- Increased risk for sponsored payment abuse
Technical summary
The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for provisioning an access key on the client's own account. This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1. The server sponsors Tempo payments, MPP.Methods.Tempo.FeePayerPolicy.measure/3 in lib/mpp/methods/tempo/fee_payer_policy.ex bounds the gas fields, the fee budget, the validity window and the access list of the client-signed 0x76 envelope, but does not check whether the envelope carries the optional key_authorization field.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying and remediating this vulnerability in ZenHive mpp versions from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify and remediate ZenHive mpp versions from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1
- Review and update access controls for sponsored payments
- Monitor for suspicious activity related to gas cost inflation
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, including its description and affected versions. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for provisioning an access key on the client's own account. Defenders should verify and remediate this vulnerability in ZenHive mpp versions from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1. The reporter provided a default example of one key with three token limits, which raises the sponsored cost from about 46,587 gas to about 1,808,700 gas.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-82751 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82751
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-82751 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82751
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82751.html
6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/0482572b47e1ffe1537ab80ab613d47b92833c2d
6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-rpwj-vrf7-4x36
6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82751
6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.