PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2025-15023 Yordam Information Technology Consulting, Training and Electronic Systems Industry and Trade Inc. CVE debrief
An Incorrect Authorization vulnerability exists in Yordam Information Technology Consulting, Training and Electronic Systems Industry and Trade Inc. Library Automation System, affecting versions from 19.5 to before 22.1. This issue allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. The CVSS score is 8.8, indicating a HIGH severity.
- Vendor
- Yordam Information Technology Consulting, Training and Electronic Systems Industry and Trade Inc.
- Product
- Library Automation System
- CVSS
- HIGH 8.8
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-05-14
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-30
- Advisory published
- 2026-05-14
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-30
Who should care
Defenders responsible for the Library Automation System, specifically those managing access control security levels, should assess exposure and prioritize verification of affected versions in their inventory. This includes reviewing system configurations, monitoring for potential exploitation attempts, and planning for vendor-supported updates or mitigations as necessary.
Why it matters
Defenders should prioritize verifying the affected versions in their inventory and assessing the configuration of access control security levels to prevent potential exploitation and security incidents.
- Verify affected versions in inventory to determine potential exposure
- Assess configuration of access control security levels to prevent exploitation
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts to detect potential security incidents
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in the Library Automation System, affecting versions from 19.5 to before 22.1. The CVSS score is 8.8, indicating a HIGH severity. The vulnerability allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue arises from incorrect authorization, which can lead to security incidents if not properly addressed. Defenders should prioritize verifying the affected versions in their inventory and assessing the configuration of access control security levels to prevent potential exploitation.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying the affected versions in their inventory and assessing the configuration of access control security levels.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify affected versions in inventory
- Assess configuration of access control security levels
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets
- Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD vulnerability detail provide information on the vulnerability. However, the vendor and product information is not clearly stated, and the affected versions require verification. Defenders should verify the affected versions in their inventory and assess the configuration of access control security levels. The information available indicates a potential security risk, but further verification is needed to confirm the extent of the vulnerability.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2025-15023 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15023
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2025-15023 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15023
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-0240
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.