PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-19499 The GNU C Library CVE debrief
The GNU C Library versions 2.38 to 2.44 have a vulnerability in the strfmon and strfmon_l functions. These functions can write past the end of the caller-supplied output buffer when a conversion uses right-justified width padding. This issue requires specific conditions to be exploitable, such as an application code path that calls strfmon or strfmon_l with right-justified width padding into a destination buffer that is large enough for the padding but too small for the internal memmove call. The field width or format may be influenced by an attacker or be a fixed susceptible pattern in the caller. At the time of publication, no network-facing application impact is known.
- Vendor
- The GNU C Library
- Product
- glibc
- CVSS
- HIGH 7.7
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-14
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-18
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-14
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-18
Who should care
Defenders responsible for applications using the GNU C Library, especially those that use strfmon or strfmon_l functions with user-influenced field widths or formats, should assess exposure and prioritize patching or mitigation.
Why it matters
The GNU C Library vulnerability CVE-2026-19499 poses a risk to applications using strfmon or strfmon_l functions with specific formatting. Defenders should assess exposure, prioritize patching, and monitor for potential attacks.
- Potential buffer overflow and arbitrary code execution if exploited.
- Possible denial of service due to application crashes.
- Data corruption or unexpected behavior in affected applications.
- Need for verification of affected versions and remediation status.
Technical summary
The GNU C Library versions 2.38 to 2.44 have a vulnerability in the strfmon and strfmon_l functions. These functions can write past the end of the caller-supplied output buffer when a conversion uses right-justified width padding. Exploitation requires an application code path that calls strfmon or strfmon_l with right-justified width padding into a destination buffer that is large enough for the padding to succeed but too small for the internal memmove call.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize patching or mitigating this vulnerability, especially in applications that use the GNU C Library's strfmon or strfmon_l functions with user-influenced field widths or formats.
Recommended defensive actions
- Assess exposure in applications using GNU C Library versions 2.38 to 2.44 and the strfmon or strfmon_l functions.
- Verify if user-influenced field widths or formats are used in calls to these functions.
- Consider applying patches or updates to GNU C Library versions 2.38 to 2.44.
- Monitor for potential buffer overflow attempts in applications using the vulnerable functions.
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified.
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details about the vulnerability in the GNU C Library. The vulnerability allows for potential buffer overflows when using the strfmon or strfmon_l functions with specific formatting. However, at the time of publication, no network-facing application impact is known.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-19499 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19499
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-19499 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-19499
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.