PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-7054 Tenda CVE debrief

A buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5, specifically in the fromPptpUserAdd function of the /goform/PPTPDClient file within the httpd component. This weakness can be exploited remotely by manipulating the opttype/username argument, potentially leading to a buffer overflow. The exploit has been made publicly available and could be used for attacks. Defenders should assess exposure, particularly those managing Tenda F456 devices, and prioritize verification of affected versions and remediation efforts.

Vendor
Tenda
Product
F456
CVSS
HIGH 7.4
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-04-26
Original CVE updated
2026-10-26
Advisory published
2026-04-26
Advisory updated
2026-10-26

Who should care

Defenders managing Tenda F456 devices should assess exposure and prioritize verification of affected versions and remediation efforts. This includes operators, platform administrators, vulnerability management teams, and security teams responsible for ensuring the security and integrity of networked systems. Those managing Tenda F456 devices should review the CVE record and NVD entry for details on the vulnerability and its potential impact on their assets

Why it matters

CVE-2026-7054 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5 that can be exploited remotely. Defenders should assess exposure, verify affected versions, and prioritize remediation efforts.

  • Remote exploitation could lead to buffer overflow
  • Publicly available exploit increases risk of attacks
  • Verification of affected versions and configurations is necessary
  • Remediation efforts should be prioritized

Technical summary

The vulnerability affects Tenda F456 1.0.0.5 and is caused by a buffer overflow in the fromPptpUserAdd function of the /goform/PPTPDClient file within the httpd component. The exploit has been made publicly available, and defenders should prioritize verification of affected versions and remediation efforts. This vulnerability can be exploited remotely by manipulating the opttype/username argument, potentially leading to a buffer overflow. The CVE Program and NVD entries provide source-grounded details on the vulnerability, but additional technical analysis may be necessary to fully understand the defensive impact

Defensive priority

High

Recommended defensive actions

  • Assess exposure of Tenda F456 devices
  • Verify affected versions and configurations
  • Prioritize remediation efforts
  • Monitor for potential exploitation attempts
  • Review compensating controls for exposed systems
  • Track exceptions and retest remediated assets
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, including its CVSS score of 7.4 and HIGH severity. The exploit has been made publicly available, increasing the risk of attacks. Defenders should verify affected versions and configurations, assess exposure, and prioritize remediation efforts. Evidence from the CVE Program and NVD suggests that Tenda F456 1.0.0.5 is affected, but details on other potentially affected versions are limited. Further verification is necessary to determine the full scope of affected systems

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-7054 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7054

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-7054 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7054

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.