PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-93950 StylemixThemes CVE debrief
A Missing Authorization vulnerability exists in the WordPress Motors theme, version 1.4.108 and earlier. This issue allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 and is classified as HIGH severity. Defenders should assess their exposure and take necessary actions to mitigate the vulnerability. The CVE record and source item provide details on the vulnerability, including its CVSS score and affected versions. It is crucial for defenders to verify the version of the Motors theme in use and ensure it is updated to a version that addresses this vulnerability.
- Vendor
- StylemixThemes
- Product
- Motors
- CVSS
- HIGH 7.5
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-10-10
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-10-10
- Advisory published
- 2026-10-10
- Advisory updated
- 2026-10-10
Who should care
Defenders responsible for WordPress installations using the Motors theme should assess their exposure and take necessary actions to mitigate the vulnerability.
Why it matters
CVE-2026-93950 is a high-severity vulnerability in the WordPress Motors theme that allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. Defenders should prioritize verifying the version of the Motors theme in use and ensuring it is updated to a version that addresses this vulnerability.
- Defenders need to verify the version of the Motors theme in use and update to a patched version if necessary to prevent potential exploitation.
- Reviewing access control configurations is crucial to ensure they are properly set up and not vulnerable to exploitation.
Technical summary
The WordPress Motors theme, version 1.4.108 and earlier, is vulnerable to a Missing Authorization vulnerability. This allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially leading to unauthorized actions. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 and is classified as HIGH severity. Defenders should prioritize verifying the version of the Motors theme in use and ensuring it is updated to a version that addresses this vulnerability. Reviewing access control configurations is crucial to ensure they are properly set up and not
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying the version of the Motors theme in use and ensuring it is updated to a version that addresses this vulnerability.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify the version of the Motors theme in use and update to a patched version if necessary
- Review access control configurations to ensure they are properly set up
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts
Evidence notes
The CVE record and source item provide details on the vulnerability, including its CVSS score and affected versions. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 and is classified as HIGH severity. Defenders should verify the version of the Motors theme in use and ensure it is updated to a version that addresses this vulnerability. The source item provides additional information on the vulnerability, and defenders should review this information to understand the potential impact. The CVE-
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-93950 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-93950
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-93950 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93950
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
WordPress Motors theme <= 1.4.108 - Broken Access Control vulnerability
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/main/cves/2026/93xxx/CVE-2026-93950.json
cve_program_cvelist_v5
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.