PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-59293 Spring CVE debrief

AI-assisted PatchSiren debrief based on the supplied source corpus. The CVE record was published on 2026-08-27T20:17:55.460Z and has not been modified since then. The NVD entry is currently Analyzed. Security teams responsible for Spring Integration deployments, particularly those using SMB protocol, should review and apply patches to mitigate potential NTLM relay and content-tampering attacks. This includes teams managing affected versions (6.4.0-6.4.12, 6.5.0-6.5.10, 7.0.0-7.0.5, and 7.1.0) and those who need to verify SMB protocol usage in their environment. The jCIFS client in Spring Integration negotiates down to SMB1/CIFS, which lacks mandatory signing/encryption, making it vulnerable to NTLM relay and content-tampering MITM attacks.

Vendor
Spring
Product
Spring Integration
CVSS
MEDIUM 6.6
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-27
Original CVE updated
2026-08-31
Advisory published
2026-08-27
Advisory updated
2026-08-31

Who should care

Security teams responsible for Spring Integration deployments, particularly those using SMB protocol, should review and apply patches to mitigate potential NTLM relay and content-tampering attacks. This includes teams managing affected versions (6.4.0-6.4.12, 6.5.0-6.5.10, 7.0.0-7.0.5, and 7.1.0) and those who need to verify SMB protocol usage in their environment.

Technical summary

The jCIFS client in Spring Integration negotiates down to SMB1/CIFS, which lacks mandatory signing/encryption, making it vulnerable to NTLM relay and content-tampering MITM attacks. Affected versions include Spring Integration 6.4.0-6.4.12, 6.5.0-6.5.10, 7.0.0-7.0.5, and 7.1.0. Security teams should verify the SMB protocol usage in their environment and review vendor advisories for further guidance. The vulnerability allows attackers to perform NTLM relay and content-tampering attacks, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data manipulation.

Defensive priority

Medium-priority defensive review recommended due to potential impact on SMB protocol security.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Review and apply vendor patches for affected Spring Integration versions
  • Implement compensating controls for SMB protocol security
  • Monitor for potential NTLM relay and content-tampering attacks
  • Inventory and verify SMB protocol usage in the environment
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
  • Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed

Evidence notes

Evidence from official CVE and NVD sources indicates potential vulnerability in Spring Integration versions due to SMB1/CIFS negotiation. Further review of vendor advisories recommended. The jCIFS client in Spring Integration negotiates down to SMB1/CIFS, which lacks mandatory signing/encryption, making it vulnerable to NTLM relay and content-tampering MITM attacks. Affected versions include Spring Integration 6.4.0-6.4.12, 6.5.0-6.5.10, 7.0.0-7.0.5, and 7.1.0. Security teams should verify the SMB protocol usage in their environment and review vendor advisories for further guidance.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-59293 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59293

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-59293 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59293

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.