PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2024-26924 Siemens CVE debrief
CVE-2024-26924 is a use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's netfilter subsystem, specifically within the nft_set_pipapo module used for packet classification. The flaw occurs when handling large batches of elements with rapid add/remove patterns in nftables sets. When multiple elements share the same key—possible when an existing element has timed out or is inactive for the next generation—the removal function may unmap the wrong element. This causes the non-deactivated element to become unreachable (leaked) while the deactivated element remains reachable in the set data structure, leading to stale pointer dereferences and potential kernel crashes. The vulnerability was resolved by adding validation to ensure the fully matching key maps to the correctly deactivated element before removal, with additional bug/warn traps to prevent removal of non-existent elements.
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.9
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2025-08-12
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-02-25
- Advisory published
- 2025-08-12
- Advisory updated
- 2026-02-25
Who should care
System administrators managing Linux-based network infrastructure, particularly those using nftables for packet filtering and classification; security teams responsible for industrial control systems and operational technology networks using Siemens SCALANCE, RUGGEDCOM, or SINEC OS products; kernel maintainers and developers working with netfilter/nftables implementations; organizations relying on timeout-based nftables sets for dynamic access control or rate limiting.
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in the nft_set_pipapo.c implementation of the Linux kernel's netfilter framework. The pipapo (Pile of Packets) set type is used for high-performance packet classification with support for timeout-based element expiration. The flaw manifests in the element removal path when: (1) multiple elements exist with identical keys, which occurs when a new element is inserted while an existing same-key element has timed out or is marked inactive for the next generation; (2) the nft_pipapo_remove() function performs a lookup and marks an element inactive; (3) during the second removal step, the function may unmap a different element than the one deactivated, due to insufficient validation that the fully matching key corresponds to the deactivated element. This error leaves the actually-deactivated element reachable in the set structure (stale pointer) while the non-deactivated element becomes unreachable (memory leak). Subsequent lookups retrieving the stale element can trigger kernel crashes. The fix adds explicit verification that the key-to-element mapping matches the deactivated element before proceeding with unmapping, plus bug/warn assertions to catch invalid removal attempts.
Defensive priority
MEDIUM
Recommended defensive actions
- Apply vendor-provided kernel updates to address the nft_set_pipapo use-after-free condition
- For Siemens SINEC OS and affected SCALANCE/RUGGEDCOM products, update to V3.1 or later as specified in vendor security advisory
- Monitor nftables set operations for abnormal patterns involving rapid element addition and removal with short timeouts
- Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of netfilter/nftables interfaces to untrusted networks
- Review and restrict administrative access to nftables configuration to reduce attack surface
- Consider enabling kernel memory sanitizers (KASAN) in test environments to detect similar use-after-free conditions during validation
Evidence notes
The vulnerability description is derived from the Linux kernel commit message resolving the issue, as cited in CISA advisory ICSA-25-226-15 and Siemens ProductCERT SSA-613116. The technical analysis of the two-step removal process and key collision scenario is based on the detailed commit notes provided in the source corpus. CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yields a base score of 5.9 (MEDIUM), reflecting network attack vector but high attack complexity due to the specific timing conditions required.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2024-26924 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2024-26924 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26924
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source item URL
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-226-15.json
cisa_csaf
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/csaf/ssa-613116.json
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-226-15
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-10-301-01
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/ics-recommended-practices
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/topics/industrial-control-systems
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/recommended_practices/NCCIC_ICS-CERT_Defense_in_Depth_2016_S508C.pdf
Reference
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.