PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2023-52875 Siemens CVE debrief
A vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Mediatek clock driver (clk-mt2701) was resolved by adding a null-check for mtk_alloc_clk_data. The issue was a missing validation that could lead to undefined behavior if memory allocation failed. Siemens has assessed this CVE as **Misinformed** for their affected industrial networking products (RUGGEDCOM RST2428P, SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family, and SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family), indicating the vulnerability does not actually affect these products as initially reported. The CVE was published on 2025-08-12 and last modified on 2026-02-25. No CVSS score is available. This is not a Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV).
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
- CVSS
- Unknown
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2025-08-12
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-02-25
- Advisory published
- 2025-08-12
- Advisory updated
- 2026-02-25
Who should care
Organizations running Siemens RUGGEDCOM and SCALANCE industrial networking equipment; Linux kernel maintainers for Mediatek SoC support; OT security teams monitoring CISA ICS advisories
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in the Mediatek clock driver for MT2701 SoCs in the Linux kernel. The fix adds a null-check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data(), which allocates memory for clock data structures. Without this check, a failed memory allocation could result in null pointer dereference. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference). Siemens has determined this CVE does not actually affect their listed products despite initial inclusion in affected product lists.
Defensive priority
low
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify current firmware version on affected Siemens devices
- Review Siemens ProductCERT advisory SSA-613116 for product-specific guidance
- Apply vendor-recommended updates if applicable
- Monitor CISA ICS advisories for future updates
Evidence notes
The source CSAF document (ICSA-25-226-15) explicitly marks this CVE with threat category 'impact' and details 'Misinformed' for all affected product IDs (CSAFPID-0001, CSAFPID-0003, CSAFPID-0004). The CVE description indicates a kernel-level fix was implemented. No CVSS vector is provided in the source.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2023-52875 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2023-52875 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52875
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source item URL
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-226-15.json
cisa_csaf
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/csaf/ssa-613116.json
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-226-15
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-10-301-01
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/ics-recommended-practices
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/topics/industrial-control-systems
Reference
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/recommended_practices/NCCIC_ICS-CERT_Defense_in_Depth_2016_S508C.pdf
Reference
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.