PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2025-14512 Redhat CVE debrief
CVE-2025-14512 is a medium-severity vulnerability in GLib’s GIO handling that can be triggered when escape_byte_string() processes malicious file or remote filesystem attribute values. The flaw is an integer overflow that can lead to a heap buffer overflow and denial of service. NVD rates the issue as network-reachable with low attack complexity and user interaction required, and the supplied Red Hat references show affected product coverage across GLib and several Red Hat platform streams.
- Vendor
- Redhat
- Product
- Openshift
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 6.5
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2025-12-11
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-01
- Advisory published
- 2025-12-11
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-01
Who should care
Teams running GLib-based software, especially systems that handle untrusted filesystem metadata or remote filesystem attributes, should review exposure. Red Hat Enterprise Linux and OpenShift users should pay attention to the linked vendor advisories and errata.
Technical summary
The issue is described as an integer overflow in GLib GIO’s escape_byte_string() function. When a malicious file or remote filesystem attribute value is processed, the overflow can lead to a heap buffer overflow and service crash. The supplied NVD vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, and the mapped weakness is CWE-190. NVD’s vulnerable range for GLib ends before 2.86.3.
Defensive priority
Medium. The issue is denial-of-service oriented but can be reached remotely with user interaction, and the affected surface includes widely used GLib/GIO functionality.
Recommended defensive actions
- Update GLib to 2.86.3 or later, or install the vendor-fixed package update for your platform.
- Apply the relevant Red Hat security errata linked to this CVE for affected RHEL or OpenShift systems.
- Inventory applications and services that use GLib/GIO to process file metadata or remote filesystem attributes.
- Treat untrusted filesystem metadata and remote attribute values as security-relevant input in operational reviews.
- Monitor for crashes or abnormal termination in GLib-dependent services until remediation is complete.
Evidence notes
The debrief is based on the supplied NVD record, which lists GLib as vulnerable before 2.86.3 and provides the CVSS vector and CWE-190 mapping. Red Hat advisory links and the GNOME GLib issue reference corroborate vendor tracking and remediation context. No KEV entry was present in the supplied data. Published date used here is 2025-12-11 and modified date is 2026-05-11, per the provided timeline.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2025-14512 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2025-14512 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14512
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15953
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15969
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15971
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19148
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19361
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7461
-
Mitigation or vendor reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14512
[email protected] - Third Party Advisory
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.