PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2016-5824 Redhat CVE debrief
CVE-2016-5824 affects libical 1.0 and can be triggered by a crafted .ics file, resulting in a denial of service through a use-after-free condition. NVD assigns a medium CVSS score (5.5) with high availability impact, and the official vector indicates user interaction is required. Organizations that parse calendar data or ship libical-based packages should treat this as a patching issue rather than a theoretical parser bug.
- Vendor
- Redhat
- Product
- Unknown
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.5
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2017-01-27
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-05-13
- Advisory published
- 2017-01-27
- Advisory updated
- 2026-05-13
Who should care
Administrators and developers running libical 1.0 or downstream packages that process .ics files, especially on affected Ubuntu and Red Hat Enterprise Linux platforms listed in NVD. Security teams responsible for desktop, mail, calendar, or file-import workflows that accept untrusted calendar content should also review exposure.
Technical summary
NVD records the weakness as CWE-416 (use-after-free). The vulnerability is described as a crafted .ics file causing denial of service in libical 1.0. The CVSS 3.0 vector is AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, which means the primary documented impact is availability loss and exploitation depends on user interaction. NVD also lists libical_project:libical 1.0 and several downstream OS CPEs as vulnerable.
Defensive priority
Medium: the impact is availability-focused and the CVSS score is moderate, but the issue is still important anywhere untrusted .ics files may be opened or imported.
Recommended defensive actions
- Inventory systems and applications that bundle or depend on libical 1.0.
- Apply vendor fixes or security updates referenced by the NVD record for your platform (for example Red Hat and Ubuntu advisories where applicable).
- Prioritize patching user-facing applications and services that open, import, or parse untrusted .ics files.
- Restrict or sanitize handling of externally supplied calendar files until patched versions are deployed.
- Validate downstream package status on supported distributions rather than assuming the base library alone determines exposure.
Evidence notes
The debrief is based on the official NVD record and the supplied CVE metadata. NVD describes the issue as a libical 1.0 use-after-free leading to denial of service, maps it to CWE-416, and lists libical 1.0 plus multiple downstream OS CPEs as vulnerable. The references include OSS-security mailing list entries, libical issue tracker items, and vendor advisories from Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Gentoo. The CVSS vector supplied by NVD indicates user interaction is required.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2016-5824 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-5824
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2016-5824 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5824
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Mitigation or vendor reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0269
[email protected] - Third Party Advisory
-
Mitigation or vendor reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0270
[email protected] - Third Party Advisory
-
Mitigation or vendor reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/libical/libical/issues/235
[email protected] - Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.