PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-85475 Red Hat CVE debrief
A flaw in the Ansible Automation Platform automation controller allows a privileged user to inject rsyslog directives, potentially leading to arbitrary command execution and disclosure of sensitive information. The flaw is caused by the external logging configuration being generated by interpolating user-controlled settings into an rsyslog RainerScript config file without neutralizing RainerScript syntax. This could lead to full compromise of the control plane and decryption of all stored credentials.
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7
- CVSS
- HIGH 7.2
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-23
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-10-16
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-23
- Advisory updated
- 2026-10-16
Who should care
System administrators and security teams responsible for Ansible Automation Platform deployments should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. They should review and restrict access to the automation controller's external logging configuration, verify and apply vendor-provided patches or updates, and monitor rsyslog configuration and logs for suspicious activity.
Why it matters
A privileged user can inject rsyslog directives, potentially leading to arbitrary command execution and disclosure of sensitive information in Ansible Automation Platform deployments.
- Potential arbitrary command execution inside the control-plane rsyslog component
- Disclosure of the controller SECRET_KEY and database credentials
- Decryption of all stored credentials
- Full compromise of the control plane
Technical summary
The Ansible Automation Platform automation controller's external logging configuration is generated by interpolating user-controlled settings into an rsyslog RainerScript config file without neutralizing RainerScript syntax. A privileged user can inject rsyslog directives, potentially leading to arbitrary command execution and disclosure of sensitive information. This allows disclosure of the controller SECRET_KEY and database credentials, decryption of all stored credentials, and full compromise of the control plane.
Defensive priority
High
Recommended defensive actions
- Review and restrict access to the automation controller's external logging configuration
- Verify and apply vendor-provided patches or updates
- Monitor rsyslog configuration and logs for suspicious activity
- Restrict use of superuser privileges
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the flaw, but the scope of affected versions and remediation steps require verification from official sources. Affected product deployments should be reviewed for exposure, and owners should prioritize remediation based on the provided vendor guidance. The external logging configuration should be reviewed and restricted to prevent exploitation.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-85475 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-85475
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-85475 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85475
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:71177
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-85475
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.