PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-42784 Red Hat CVE debrief
A flaw in the sequoia-openpgp library allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check, potentially leading to a cryptographic integrity compromise. This issue arises from the library's incorrect inference of key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing. The vulnerability can lead to illegitimate binding of an arbitrary subkey to a certificate and forged signatures, compromising cryptographic integrity. Defenders should assess exposure and verify key integrity.
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9
- CVSS
- HIGH 7.4
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-16
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-11-03
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-16
- Advisory updated
- 2026-11-03
Who should care
Defenders responsible for maintaining cryptographic systems, particularly those using the sequoia-openpgp library, should assess exposure and verify the integrity of their cryptographic keys. This includes operators, platform administrators, vulnerability management teams, and security teams who need to ensure their systems are updated and secure.
Why it matters
CVE-2026-42784 allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check, potentially leading to a cryptographic integrity compromise. Defenders should prioritize verifying key integrity and ensuring the sequoia-openpgp library is up-to-date.
- Compromised cryptographic integrity could lead to unauthorized access or data tampering
- Inaccurate key flag inference may allow attackers to forge signatures
- Verification of key integrity and library updates is crucial
Technical summary
The sequoia-openpgp library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, allowing an attacker to bypass the back-signature check and potentially leading to a cryptographic integrity compromise. This vulnerability can be exploited to illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to a certificate and forge signatures. Defenders should prioritize verifying key integrity and ensuring the library is up-to-date to mitigate this vulnerability. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.4 and is classified as HIGH severity.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying the integrity of cryptographic keys and ensuring that the sequoia-openpgp library is up-to-date.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify the integrity of cryptographic keys
- Ensure the sequoia-openpgp library is up-to-date
- Review and update affected systems
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
Evidence notes
The CVE record and source item provide details about the vulnerability, but additional information from other sources is limited. The sequoia-openpgp library's incorrect inference of key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. This can lead to a cryptographic integrity compromise. Defenders should verify key integrity and ensure the library is up-to-date.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-42784 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42784
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-42784 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42784
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Sequoia-openpgp: sequoia-openpgp: cryptographic integrity compromise via key flag confusion
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/main/cves/2026/42xxx/CVE-2026-42784.json
cve_program_cvelist_v5
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34160
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42078
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42902
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76733
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76734
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76735
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:76737
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.