PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-18369 Red Hat CVE debrief

A flaw in Dogtag PKI's ACME responder allows unauthenticated ACME account holders to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF), causing the Dogtag server to send HTTP GET requests to internal network services. With the InMemory database backend, response bodies of internal targets are disclosed to the attacker through ACME challenge errors. Defenders should assess exposure and verify internal network services that may be targeted. The flaw is due to improper validation of DNS identifiers and following HTTP redirects without validating target addresses.

Vendor
Red Hat
Product
Red Hat Certificate System 10.4 EUS for RHEL-8
CVSS
MEDIUM 5.8
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-07-30
Original CVE updated
2026-09-14
Advisory published
2026-07-30
Advisory updated
2026-09-14

Who should care

Defenders responsible for Dogtag PKI deployments, especially those using InMemory database backends, should assess their exposure and verify internal network services that may be targeted by SSRF attacks.

Why it matters

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of Dogtag PKI ACME responders and assessing internal network services due to the potential for SSRF attacks and response body disclosure.

  • Potential disclosure of internal target response bodies through ACME challenge errors
  • SSRF attacks against internal network services
  • Verification of Dogtag PKI ACME responder exposure and configuration
  • Assessment of internal network services for potential targeting by SSRF attacks

Technical summary

The Dogtag PKI ACME responder does not properly validate DNS identifiers and follows HTTP redirects without validating target addresses. This allows unauthenticated ACME account holders to perform SSRF attacks, potentially disclosing response bodies of internal targets when using the InMemory database backend. The flaw is in the ACME responder's validation and redirect handling, allowing SSRF and potential response body disclosure in certain configurations. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing internal network services.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of Dogtag PKI ACME responders, especially those with InMemory database backends, and assess internal network services that may be targeted by SSRF attacks.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify exposure of Dogtag PKI ACME responders, especially those with InMemory database backends
  • Assess internal network services that may be targeted by SSRF attacks
  • Review and apply Red Hat errata and security advisories related to this vulnerability
  • Confirm whether affected Dogtag PKI deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
  • Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the flaw in Dogtag PKI's ACME responder. Red Hat has provided errata and security advisories related to this vulnerability. Evidence is limited to public CVE and NVD details. Defenders should verify exposure using official advisories and assess internal services for potential targeting by SSRF attacks.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-18369 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18369

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-18369 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18369

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.