PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-14180 Red Hat CVE debrief
A flaw in the ChunkReader component of the Undertow HTTP server, used by WildFly and JBoss EAP, allows an attacker to bypass security controls by sending a specially crafted request with an extremely large chunk size. This issue occurs because the parser uses a single internal variable to store both the remaining chunk size and state flags, which can overlap and trick the parser into thinking a request has finished prematurely.
- Vendor
- Red Hat
- Product
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 10
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.3
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-08-11
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-22
- Advisory published
- 2026-08-11
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-22
Who should care
Defenders responsible for the security of Undertow HTTP server configurations, particularly those using WildFly and JBoss EAP, should assess their exposure and verify the security of their configurations.
Why it matters
The flaw in the ChunkReader component of the Undertow HTTP server allows an attacker to bypass security controls, potentially leading to exploitation. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing the security of their configurations.
- Potential bypass of security controls
- Possible exploitation by attackers
- Need for verification of exposure
- Priority for updating configurations
Technical summary
The ChunkReader component of the Undertow HTTP server, used by WildFly and JBoss EAP, has a flaw that allows an attacker to bypass security controls by sending a specially crafted request with an extremely large chunk size. The parser uses a single internal variable to store both the remaining chunk size and state flags, which can overlap and trick the parser into thinking a request has finished prematurely.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing the security of their Undertow HTTP server configurations, particularly those using WildFly and JBoss EAP. They should review and update their configurations to prevent exploitation.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify exposure by reviewing Undertow HTTP server configurations
- Assess the security of WildFly and JBoss EAP configurations
- Update configurations to prevent exploitation
- Monitor for suspicious requests
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD vulnerability detail provide information on the flaw in the ChunkReader component of the Undertow HTTP server. Redhat has provided references to their errata and security pages for further information.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-14180 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14180
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-14180 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14180
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70228
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70229
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70230
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70277
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14180
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.