PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-39313 QuantGeekDev CVE debrief

A vulnerability in mcp-framework versions 0.2.21 and below allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash any mcp-framework HTTP server by sending a single large POST request to /mcp, causing memory exhaustion and denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 0.2.22. The vulnerability is caused by the readRequestBody() function in the HTTP transport concatenating request body chunks into a string with no size limit, despite a maxMessageSize configuration value that is never enforced.

Vendor
QuantGeekDev
Product
mcp-framework
CVSS
HIGH 8.7
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-04-16
Original CVE updated
2026-10-26
Advisory published
2026-04-16
Advisory updated
2026-10-26

Who should care

Defenders responsible for mcp-framework deployments should assess exposure and prioritize upgrading to version 0.2.22 or later to prevent denial of service attacks. They should also review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified, and track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-39313 is a vulnerability in mcp-framework that allows remote denial of service attacks due to a lack of input validation and size limits for request bodies. Defenders should prioritize upgrading to version 0.2.22 or later to prevent attacks.

  • Denial of service attacks are possible
  • Memory exhaustion can occur due to large request bodies
  • Input validation and size limits are necessary to prevent attacks
  • Upgrade to version 0.2.22 or later to fix the vulnerability

Technical summary

The readRequestBody() function in the HTTP transport of mcp-framework versions 0.2.21 and below concatenates request body chunks into a string with no size limit, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash any mcp-framework HTTP server by sending a single large POST request to /mcp. This issue has been fixed in version 0.2.22. Defenders should prioritize upgrading to version 0.2.22 or later to prevent denial of service attacks and implement input validation and size limits for request bodies to prevent attacks.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize upgrading to version 0.2.22 or later to prevent denial of service attacks.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Upgrade to version 0.2.22 or later
  • Implement input validation and size limits for request bodies
  • Monitor for large POST requests to /mcp
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.
  • Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance.
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed.
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.

Evidence notes

The vulnerability is caused by the readRequestBody() function in the HTTP transport concatenating request body chunks into a string with no size limit, despite a maxMessageSize configuration value that is never enforced. Defenders should verify the affected scope and severity based on official advisory or CVE record and review compensating controls for exposed systems.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-39313 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39313

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-39313 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39313

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.