PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-82630 PowerJob CVE debrief
CVE-2026-82630 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob up to 5.1.2, specifically affecting MuConnectionManager.getOrCreateConnection. The vulnerability allows for remote exploitation and a public exploit is available. This could lead to unauthorized actions on the server, potentially compromising data integrity or confidentiality. Organizations should prioritize verification of their inventory and apply compensating controls to limit potential SSRF attacks. The project was informed but has not responded. Limited details are available on exploitability and affected scope. The CVE record was published on 2026-08-31T08:17:03.700Z and has not been modified since then. Evidence is limited, and defenders should focus on verifying affected systems and applying mitigations. AI-assisted PatchSiren debrief based on the supplied source corpus.
- Vendor
- PowerJob
- Product
- PowerJob
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.5
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-08-31
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-08-31
- Advisory published
- 2026-08-31
- Advisory updated
- 2026-08-31
Who should care
Organizations using PowerJob up to 5.1.2 should be aware of this vulnerability and take steps to verify their inventory and apply compensating controls. This includes reviewing system configurations, ensuring proper security measures are in place, and monitoring for potential exploitation attempts. Security teams and vulnerability management teams should prioritize this vulnerability due to its potential impact and the availability of a public exploit. Additionally, operators and administrators of affected systems should be informed and involved in the remediation process to ensure timely and effective mitigation of the vulnerability's risks. IT and security teams should collaborate to assess the vulnerability's impact on their specific environments and implement necessary controls to prevent exploitation. This may involve updating affected systems, enhancing monitoring capabilities, and implementing additional security measures to detect and prevent potential attacks. By taking proactive steps, organizations can minimize the risk associated with this vulnerability and protect their assets from potential exploitation. The vulnerability's impact on business operations should be carefully assessed, and appropriate measures should be taken to ensure business continuity and minimize potential disruptions. Effective communication and coordination between different teams and stakeholders are crucial to ensure a swift and successful remediation process. The vulnerability's potential impact on data integrity and confidentiality should be carefully evaluated, and measures should be taken to prevent potential data breaches or unauthorized access. By prioritizing this vulnerability and taking proactive steps, organizations can reduce the risk of exploitation and protect their assets from potential harm. The CVE record and related sources provide valuable information for organizations to assess and mitigate the vulnerability's risks effectively. Organizations should leverage this information to inform their remediation efforts and ensure that affected systems are properly secured. The vulnerability's potential impact on system availability and performance should also be a重点
Technical summary
CVE-2026-82630 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob up to 5.1.2, specifically affecting MuConnectionManager.getOrCreateConnection. The vulnerability allows for remote exploitation and a public exploit is available. This could lead to unauthorized actions on the server, potentially compromising data integrity or confidentiality. Organizations should prioritize verification of their inventory and apply compensating controls to limit potential SSRF attacks.
Defensive priority
Organizations using PowerJob up to 5.1.2 should prioritize verification of their inventory and apply compensating controls to limit potential SSRF attacks.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify PowerJob inventory and version
- Apply compensating controls to limit SSRF attacks
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts
- Review system configurations
- Ensure proper security measures are in place
- Inform operators and administrators of affected systems
- Collaborate with IT and security teams to assess impact
Evidence notes
The CVE-2026-82630 record indicates a server-side request forgery vulnerability in PowerJob up to 5.1.2, specifically in MuConnectionManager.getOrCreateConnection. The project was informed but has not responded. Limited details are available on exploitability and affected scope. Organizations should verify their inventory, review compensating controls, and monitor for potential exploitation attempts. Evidence is limited, and defenders should focus on verifying affected systems and applying mitigations.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-82630 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82630
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-82630 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82630
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/PowerJob/PowerJob/
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/PowerJob/PowerJob/issues/1181
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-82630
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://vuldb.com/submit/893779
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://vuldb.com/vuln/397128
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://vuldb.com/vuln/397128/cti
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.