PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-63073 OpenSSL CVE debrief

OpenSSL CMP response validation vulnerability allows a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint to crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate. The reliable consequence is a denial of service. This issue affects OpenSSL CMP clients using versions 3.4.0-3.4.7, 3.5.0-3.5.8, 3.6.0-3.6.4, and 4.0.0-4.0.2. Defenders should assess exposure and prioritize patching or compensating controls. The vulnerability is caused by passing an attacker-controlled sender distinguished name as a format string to ERR_raise_data().

Vendor
OpenSSL
Product
Unknown
CVSS
CRITICAL 9.8
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-25
Original CVE updated
2026-09-11
Advisory published
2026-08-25
Advisory updated
2026-09-11

Who should care

Defenders responsible for OpenSSL CMP clients, particularly those using versions 3.4.0-3.4.7, 3.5.0-3.5.8, 3.6.0-3.6.4, and 4.0.0-4.0.2, should assess exposure and prioritize patching or compensating controls.

Why it matters

The OpenSSL CMP response validation vulnerability allows a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint to crash a CMP client, resulting in a denial of service. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and applying patches or compensating controls.

  • Denial of service (DoS) via crashing of CMP clients
  • Verification of exposure for CMP clients using vulnerable OpenSSL versions
  • Prioritization of patching or compensating controls for vulnerable systems
  • Monitoring for unusual CMP response activity

Technical summary

The OpenSSL CMP response validation vulnerability occurs when validating a received CMP message. The peer-supplied sender distinguished name is converted with X509_NAME_oneline() and passed directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). This allows an attacker to control the format string, causing a denial of service when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. The issue is limited to CMP clients that configure an expected sender or pin a server certificate. The vulnerability affects OpenSSL versions 3.4.0-3.4.7, 3.5.0-3.5.8, 3.6.0-3.6.4, and 4.0.0-4.0.2.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of CMP clients using OpenSSL versions 3.4.0-3.4.7, 3.5.0-3.5.8, 3.6.0-3.6.4, and 4.0.0-4.0.2, and applying patches or compensating controls.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify OpenSSL versions 3.4.0-3.4.7, 3.5.0-3.5.8, 3.6.0-3.6.4, and 4.0.0-4.0.2 are updated to the latest patched versions.
  • Review CMP client configurations for expected senders or pinned server certificates.
  • Implement compensating controls, such as monitoring for unusual CMP response activity.
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.
  • Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance.

Evidence notes

The vulnerability is caused by passing an attacker-controlled sender distinguished name as a format string to ERR_raise_data(). The issue is limited to CMP clients that configure an expected sender or pin a server certificate.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-63073 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-63073 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.