PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2025-22726 _nK CVE debrief

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the nK Themes Helper plugin for WordPress, affecting versions from n/a through 1.7.9. This issue allows for Server Side Request Forgery. The vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or system compromise. Defenders should verify exposure, assess potential impact, and consider updating the plugin. The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, but additional verification is necessary to confirm affected deployments and assess operational impact.

Vendor
_nK
Product
nK Themes Helper
CVSS
MEDIUM 6.4
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-01-08
Original CVE updated
2026-09-30
Advisory published
2026-01-08
Advisory updated
2026-09-30

Who should care

Defenders and administrators of WordPress installations using the nK Themes Helper plugin should assess potential exposure and impact. They should verify if the plugin version is within the affected range (from n/a through 1.7.9) and consider updating the plugin to a version beyond 1.7.9 if available. Security teams and vulnerability management teams should also be aware of the potential risks and take necessary措施 to

Why it matters

Defenders should care about CVE-2025-22726 because it involves a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the nK Themes Helper plugin for WordPress, which could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or system compromise. The vulnerability affects versions from n/a through 1.7.9, and defenders should verify exposure, assess potential impact, and consider updating the plugin.

  • Potential unauthorized access to internal resources via SSRF
  • Possible data breaches or system compromise
  • Need for verification of plugin version and exposure
  • Potential impact on system availability and integrity

Technical summary

The nK Themes Helper plugin for WordPress has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affecting versions from n/a through 1.7.9. This allows for Server Side Request Forgery, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data breaches, or system compromise. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing potential impact, focusing on systems using the affected plugin. The vulnerability class is SSRF, and the likely operational impact includes unauthorized access to internal resources.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing potential impact, focusing on systems using the affected plugin.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify if the nK Themes Helper plugin version is within the affected range (from n/a through 1.7.9) in your WordPress installations.
  • Assess potential exposure and impact on systems using the affected plugin.
  • Consider updating the plugin to a version beyond 1.7.9 if available.

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the SSRF vulnerability in the nK Themes Helper plugin. Evidence is limited, and defenders should verify exposure and assess potential impact. The vulnerability affects versions from n/a through 1.7.9. Additional verification tasks are necessary to confirm affected deployments and assess operational impact. The source details are limited, and explicit evidence-limit language should be used when discussing vulnerability facts.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2025-22726 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22726

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2025-22726 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22726

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.