PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-104810 Mitel CVE debrief
CVE-2026-104810 allows authenticated remote attackers to delete sensitive files on vulnerable Mitel MiVoice Office 400 installations due to a directory traversal vulnerability in the web portal's file management interface. This can lead to a denial-of-service condition. The vulnerability requires authentication and affects the system's underlying Linux files.
- Vendor
- Mitel
- Product
- Mitel MiVoice Office 400
- CVSS
- HIGH 8.4
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-10-05
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-10-05
- Advisory published
- 2026-10-05
- Advisory updated
- 2026-10-05
Who should care
System administrators and security teams responsible for Mitel MiVoice Office 400 deployments should assess exposure to this vulnerability and prioritize remediation efforts to prevent potential denial-of-service conditions.
Why it matters
CVE-2026-104810 is a high-severity vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice Office 400 that allows authenticated remote attackers to delete sensitive files, potentially leading to a denial-of-service condition. System administrators and security teams should assess exposure, restrict access to the file management interface, and monitor for suspicious activities.
- Potential denial-of-service condition affecting the underlying system
- Deletion of critical system or application files
- Requires authentication to exploit
- Verification of file management interface access controls and monitoring for suspicious activities
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in the web portal's file management interface on TCP port 443, specifically under Maintenance → File Management → File Browser. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access and delete files outside of the intended directory, including system and application files, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service condition. This can lead to significant operational impact, including potential disruption of critical system functions and data integrity. System administrators and security teams should assess exposure, restrict access to the file management interface, and monitor for suspicious activities to mitigate potential risks.
Defensive priority
High-priority assessment and remediation recommended for Mitel MiVoice Office 400 deployments, focusing on restricting access to the file management interface and monitoring for suspicious file deletion activities.
Recommended defensive actions
- Assess exposure of Mitel MiVoice Office 400 installations to this vulnerability
- Restrict access to the file management interface in the web portal
- Monitor for suspicious file deletion activities on the system
- Verify authentication mechanisms for the file management interface
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, including its high CVSS score of 8.4 and the requirement for authentication to exploit. However, specific affected versions and remediation steps are not provided in the source corpus.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-104810 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-104810
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-104810 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-104810
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://digitalcanion.com/en/security-research/
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.