PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-104809 Mitel CVE debrief

CVE-2026-104809 allows an attacker to load a malicious .so file, leading to arbitrary code execution in a privileged process on the Mitel Linux virtual machine. The vulnerability relies on a predictable module name without proper origin or integrity verification. DigitalCanion discovered this issue, which has a CVSS score of 8.4 and is classified as HIGH severity.

Vendor
Mitel
Product
Mitel MiVoice Office 400
CVSS
HIGH 8.4
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-10-05
Original CVE updated
2026-10-05
Advisory published
2026-10-05
Advisory updated
2026-10-05

Who should care

Defenders responsible for securing Mitel Linux virtual machines should assess exposure and prioritize verifying the integrity of loaded modules and ensuring proper validation of file origins.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-104809 is a high-severity vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in a privileged process on the Mitel Linux virtual machine. Defenders should prioritize verifying module integrity and origin validation to prevent exploitation.

  • Arbitrary code execution in a privileged process
  • Potential for full compromise of the Mitel Linux virtual machine
  • Need for verification of module integrity and origin validation

Technical summary

The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause the system to load a malicious .so file instead of the expected legitimate module, leading to arbitrary code execution in a privileged process on the Mitel Linux virtual machine. The vulnerability relies on a predictable module name without proper origin or integrity verification. DigitalCanion discovered this issue, which has a CVSS score of 8.4 and is classified as HIGH severity. The loading mechanism relies on a predictable module name without adequately verifying the file’s origin or integrity. A malicious shared object using the expected name can therefore be loaded by a privileged process. The module code then executes within the context and privileges of that

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying the integrity of loaded modules and ensuring proper validation of file origins to prevent arbitrary code execution.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify the integrity of loaded modules and ensure proper validation of file origins
  • Implement secure module loading mechanisms
  • Monitor for suspicious activity related to module loading
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.
  • Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified.
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD detail page provide information on the vulnerability, including its CVSS score and weaknesses. DigitalCanion's security research page is also referenced. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause the system to load a malicious .so file instead of the expected legitimate module, leading to arbitrary code execution in a privileged process. Defenders should verify the integrity of loaded modules and ensure proper validation of file origins to prevent exploitation. The loading mechanism relies on a predictable

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-104809 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-104809

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-104809 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-104809

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.