PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-64255 Linux CVE debrief

A HIGH severity vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's wifi iwlwifi mld. The vulnerability is caused by the use of ffs(ba_data->sta_mask) - 1 to derive a station ID without checking that sta_mask is non-zero. When sta_mask is zero, ffs() returns 0 and the subtraction wraps to 0xFFFFFFFF, causing an out-of-bounds access on fw_id_to_link_sta[]. This issue affects Linux kernel users and administrators who use wifi iwlwifi mld. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 8.8 and is considered HIGH severity.

Vendor
Linux
Product
Unknown
CVSS
HIGH 8.8
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-07-24
Original CVE updated
2026-08-17
Advisory published
2026-07-24
Advisory updated
2026-08-17

Who should care

Linux kernel users and administrators who use wifi iwlwifi mld, as well as security teams and vulnerability management teams responsible for ensuring the security and integrity of Linux kernel-based systems.

Technical summary

The Linux kernel's wifi iwlwifi mld has a vulnerability that can cause an out-of-bounds access when sta_mask is zero. The vulnerability is caused by the use of ffs(ba_data->sta_mask) - 1 to derive a station ID without checking that sta_mask is non-zero. This issue affects Linux kernel users and administrators who use wifi iwlwifi mld. To fix this vulnerability, WARN_ON_ONCE(!ba_data->sta_mask) guards are added before each ffs() call, consistent with the existing check in iwl_mld_ampdu_rx_start(). The HIGH severity of this vulnerability, with a CVSS score of 8.8, emphasizes the need for prompt action to mitigate this vulnerability.

Defensive priority

High priority due to HIGH severity and potential for out-of-bounds access. Linux kernel users and administrators should prioritize patching and verifying wifi iwlwifi mld configurations to prevent potential attacks. Compensating controls, such as monitoring and detection, should be reviewed for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified. Asset inventory and rollback/change windows should also be considered to minimize potential impact. Source tracking and exposure review are essential to ensure that affected systems are properly addressed. Regular revalidation and testing of remediated assets are crucial to confirm the effectiveness of the patches and mitigations implemented. The CVSS score of 8.8 indicates a high level of severity, emphasizing the need for prompt action to mitigate this vulnerability. Linux kernel users and administrators should also consider the potential operational impact of this vulnerability and review the context of their specific environment to ensure that adequate measures are taken to prevent exploitation. By prioritizing patching and verification, Linux kernel users and administrators can minimize the risk associated with this vulnerability and maintain the security and integrity of their systems. The HIGH severity of this vulnerability underscores the importance of swift and effective mitigation to prevent potential attacks and minimize potential impact. Linux kernel users and administrators should work closely with their security teams to ensure that all necessary steps are taken to address this vulnerability and prevent future attacks. The use of compensating controls, such as monitoring and detection, can help to identify and respond to potential attacks in a timely and effective manner. By taking a proactive and comprehensive approach to mitigating this vulnerability, Linux kernel users and administrators can help to protect their systems and maintain the security and integrity of their environments. The importance of source tracking and exposure review cannot be overstated, as these measures can help to ensure that affected systems are properly addressed and that the risk associated with this vulnerability ismin

Recommended defensive actions

  • Apply patches from official Linux kernel sources
  • Verify and update wifi iwlwifi mld configurations
  • Monitor for potential out-of-bounds access attempts
  • Perform exposure review to identify potentially affected systems
  • Implement compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
  • Conduct asset inventory to ensure all affected systems are properly addressed
  • Track exceptions and retest remediated assets to confirm the effectiveness of the patches and mitigations implemented

Evidence notes

The CVE record was published on 2026-07-24T16:16:55.257Z and was last modified on 2026-07-27T05:16:37.810Z. The NVD entry is currently 8.8 HIGH. Linux kernel users should verify their systems for the wifi iwlwifi mld vulnerability and check for official patches. Evidence limits suggest that affected scope and severity details are based on vendor reports and may be subject to change as more information becomes available.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-64255 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64255

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-64255 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64255

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

  • Source reference

    Unverified legacy reference

    URL: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1de92789ce31e46fa7e7d8e89c90b19cdb1c103b

    416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

  • Source reference

    Unverified legacy reference

    URL: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f056fc2b927448d37eca6b6cacc3d1b0f67b20d2

    416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

  • Source reference

    Unverified legacy reference

    URL: https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe7f339f63c9dc4ca546ed7ac38ba4bb3a99dcfc

    416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.