PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-81687 jahlives CVE debrief

CVE-2026-81687 debrief based on the supplied source corpus. The CVE record was published on 2026-08-27T17:20:58.410Z and has not been modified since then. The NVD entry is currently Deferred. Defenders should assess the potential impact of CPU resource consumption on system performance and availability. The vulnerability affects openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9, which fail to enforce a time ceiling on key derivation function iteration counts specified in file metadata. This allows attackers to craft files with extremely high KDF iteration counts to consume CPU resources for unbounded periods before password verification occurs.

Vendor
jahlives
Product
openssl_encrypt
CVSS
HIGH 8.7
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-27
Original CVE updated
2026-09-23
Advisory published
2026-08-27
Advisory updated
2026-09-23

Who should care

Defenders responsible for systems using openssl_encrypt should assess exposure and potential impact of CPU resource consumption. This includes operators, platform administrators, vulnerability management teams, and security teams who need to verify exposure of openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 and evaluate the potential impact on system performance and availability.

Why it matters

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 and assessing the impact of potential CPU resource consumption, as attackers can craft files to consume CPU resources for unbounded periods.

  • Potential CPU resource consumption leading to denial-of-service
  • Need to verify exposure of openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9
  • Potential impact on system performance and availability

Technical summary

openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 fail to enforce a time ceiling on key derivation function iteration counts specified in file metadata, allowing attackers to craft files with extremely high KDF iteration counts to consume CPU resources for unbounded periods before password verification occurs. This vulnerability can lead to denial-of-service attacks and impact system performance and availability. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 and assessing the impact of potential CPU resource consumption.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 and assessing the impact of potential CPU resource consumption.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify openssl_encrypt version and assess exposure
  • Evaluate potential impact of CPU resource consumption
  • Consider upgrading to version 1.4.9 or later
  • Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up

Evidence notes

The CVE description notes that openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 fail to enforce a time ceiling on key derivation function iteration counts specified in file metadata, allowing attackers to craft files that consume CPU resources for unbounded periods.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-81687 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-81687

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-81687 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81687

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.