PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-88962 IBM CVE debrief

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. This high-severity vulnerability requires defenders to verify exposure, assess potential code execution risks, and implement compensating controls to limit potential risks. The vulnerability affects Langflow OSS deployments, and defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing potential code execution risks. The CVE record and source item provide details on the vulnerability, but limited information is available on exploitation or victim impact.

Vendor
IBM
Product
Langflow OSS
CVSS
HIGH 8.8
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-10-07
Original CVE updated
2026-10-08
Advisory published
2026-10-07
Advisory updated
2026-10-08

Who should care

Defenders responsible for Langflow OSS deployments, security teams, and developers should assess exposure and potential code execution risks.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-88962 is a high-severity vulnerability in IBM Langflow OSS, allowing remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure, assessing potential code execution risks, and implementing compensating controls to limit potential risks.

  • Potential code execution risks require verification and mitigation
  • Authenticated attackers may exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code
  • Langflow OSS deployments may be vulnerable to remote attacks

Technical summary

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to improper control of code generation, allowing a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability requires defenders to assess exposure and potential code execution risks in Langflow OSS deployments and to implement compensating controls to limit potential risks. The CVE record and source item provide details on the vulnerability, but limited information is available on exploitation or victim impact.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and assessing potential code execution risks in Langflow OSS deployments.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify Langflow OSS version and assess exposure
  • Review code generation controls and authentication mechanisms
  • Implement compensating controls to limit potential code execution risks

Evidence notes

The CVE record and source item provide details on the vulnerability, but limited information is available on exploitation or victim impact. Defenders should verify Langflow OSS version and assess exposure, review code generation controls and authentication mechanisms, and implement compensating controls to limit potential code execution risks. The source item and CVE record provide evidence of the vulnerability, but additional verification is required to confirm affected scope and to  

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-88962 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-88962

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-88962 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88962

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

  • Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

    Unverified legacy reference

    URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/main/cves/2026/88xxx/CVE-2026-88962.json

    cve_program_cvelist_v5

  • Source reference

    Unverified legacy reference

    URL: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7290694

    Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, patch

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.