PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-82344 IBM CVE debrief
IBM Guardium Data Protection Buffer Overflow Vulnerability: A heap-based buffer overflow exists in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0 and 12.1. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TDS login fragments that exceed the fixed-size reassembly buffer, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution on the affected system. Defenders should assess exposure and prioritize patching due to the high CVSS score.
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- CVSS
- HIGH 8.1
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-10-08
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-10-10
- Advisory published
- 2026-10-08
- Advisory updated
- 2026-10-10
Who should care
Defenders responsible for IBM Guardium Data Protection systems should assess exposure and prioritize patching. This vulnerability has a high CVSS score and could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution if exploited.
Why it matters
This high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution if exploited. Defenders should assess exposure, prioritize patching, and verify system configurations.
- Potential denial of service due to buffer overflow
- Possible arbitrary code execution on affected systems
- Requires verification of affected versions and exposure
- Prioritize patching for Guardium Data Protection systems
Technical summary
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0 and 12.1 are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TDS login fragments that exceed the fixed-size reassembly buffer, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution on the affected system. The vulnerability is related to the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality and requires verification of affected versions and exposure. Defenders should assess exposure, prioritize patching, and verify system configurations.
Defensive priority
High
Recommended defensive actions
- Review and apply patches from IBM
- Monitor network traffic for suspicious TDS login fragments
- Verify system configurations and Guardium Data Protection versions
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
- Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance
- Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
Evidence notes
The CVE record and source item provide details on a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0 and 12.1. The vulnerability is related to the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-82344 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82344
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-82344 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82344
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
IBM Guardium Data Protection Buffer Overflow
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/main/cves/2026/82xxx/CVE-2026-82344.json
cve_program_cvelist_v5
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7291670
Supplemental source - vendor-advisory, patch
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.