PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-81941 IBM CVE debrief
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an authenticated non-administrative user to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server at the privilege level of the application process. This bypasses server-side controls intended to prevent such access. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary command execution, sensitive data exposure, file system modification, and lateral movement.
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- Langflow OSS
- CVSS
- HIGH 8.8
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-10
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-11
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-10
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-11
Who should care
Defenders and administrators of IBM Langflow OSS deployments should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. This vulnerability affects systems where authenticated non-administrative users have access to construct flows with MCP Tools components.
Why it matters
CVE-2026-81941 allows authenticated non-administrative users to execute arbitrary OS commands on IBM Langflow OSS servers, bypassing security controls. Defenders should verify exposure, restrict access to MCP Tools components, and enforce security controls to prevent exploitation.
- Arbitrary command execution on the server
- Sensitive data exposure, including credentials
- File system modification and potential lateral movement
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5, allowing authenticated non-administrative users to execute arbitrary operating system commands by constructing a flow with an MCP Tools component configured to use a local stdio subprocess transport. This bypasses LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS server-side controls. Defenders should verify exposure, restrict access to MCP Tools components, and enforce security controls to prevent exploitation. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary command execution, sensitive data exposure, file system modification, and lateral movement to services reachable from the server.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and applying remediation, focusing on restricting access to the MCP Tools component and ensuring LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS controls are enforced.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify exposure by checking if MCP Tools components are used with local stdio subprocess transport
- Restrict access to the MCP Tools component to administrative users
- Ensure LANGFLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENT_ADMIN_ONLY and LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS controls are enforced
- Monitor for suspicious activity indicating potential exploitation
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, including its description, CVSS score, and references. However, the corpus does not establish versions, exploitation, impact, or remediation beyond vendor statements.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-81941 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-81941
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-81941 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81941
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286666
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.