PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2025-31964 HCLSoftware CVE debrief
A privileged attacker could impact service availability in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2 due to improper service binding configuration. The issue allows exposure of administrative services bound to external network interfaces instead of the local authentication interface. This requires immediate verification of service binding configurations to prevent exposure of administrative services, which could impact service availability. System administrators and security teams must review and update configurations to ensure security and consider compensating controls for exposed systems.
- Vendor
- HCLSoftware
- Product
- BigFix IVR
- CVSS
- LOW 2.2
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-01-07
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-30
- Advisory published
- 2026-01-07
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-30
Who should care
System administrators and security teams responsible for HCL BigFix IVR deployments should assess their configurations and ensure that administrative services are not exposed to external network interfaces.
Why it matters
CVE-2025-31964 requires verification of HCL BigFix IVR service binding configurations to prevent exposure of administrative services, which could impact service availability. System administrators and security teams must review and update configurations to ensure security.
- Verification of service binding configuration to prevent exposure of administrative services.
- Potential impact on service availability if administrative services are exposed to external network interfaces.
- Need for immediate attention from system administrators and security teams to review and update configurations.
Technical summary
The CVE record describes an improper service binding configuration in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2, allowing a privileged attacker to impact service availability by exposing administrative services bound to external network interfaces. This issue requires verification of HCL BigFix IVR service binding configurations to prevent exposure of administrative services. System administrators and security teams must review and update configurations to ensure security and consider defensive priorities to verify the service binding configuration and ensure that administrative services are not exposed to external network interfaces.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying the service binding configuration and ensuring that administrative services are not exposed to external network interfaces. This requires immediate attention from system administrators and security teams responsible for HCL BigFix IVR deployments.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify the service binding configuration in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2 deployments.
- Ensure administrative services are bound to the local authentication interface, not external network interfaces.
- Review and update the configuration to prevent exposure of administrative services.
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified.
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD vulnerability detail provide information on the improper service binding configuration in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2. The vendor advisory from HCL provides additional context on the issue.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2025-31964 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31964
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2025-31964 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31964
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.