PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2025-52613 HCL CVE debrief
CVE-2025-52613 debrief based on the supplied source corpus. The CVE record was published on 2026-05-06T15:16:08.247Z and has not been modified since then. HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by the use of a vulnerable WSGI Server. This vulnerability could potentially increase the risk of exploitation and unauthorized access. Administrators should verify the WSGI server versions used in their deployments and assess their exposure to this vulnerability. The CVE record indicates that the vulnerability is due to the use of an outdated or insecure WSGI server.
- Vendor
- HCL
- Product
- BigFix Service Management (SM)
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 4.6
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-05-06
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-30
- Advisory published
- 2026-05-06
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-30
Who should care
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) administrators and security teams should assess exposure and verify WSGI server versions. They should also review compensating controls for exposed systems and track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented. Additionally, they should confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.
Why it matters
CVE-2025-52613 affects HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) due to a vulnerable WSGI Server, requiring verification of WSGI server versions and assessment of exposure to prevent potential exploitation.
- Verify WSGI server versions to prevent potential exploitation
- Assess exposure of HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) deployments
Technical summary
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by the use of a vulnerable WSGI Server, potentially increasing the risk of exploitation and unauthorized access. The vulnerability is caused by the use of an outdated or insecure WSGI server. Administrators should verify the WSGI server versions used in their deployments and assess their exposure to this vulnerability. The CVE record indicates that the vulnerability is due to the use of an outdated or insecure WSGI server, which could potentially increase the risk of exploitation and unauthorized access.
Defensive priority
Assess exposure of HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) deployments and verify WSGI server versions.
Recommended defensive actions
- Inventory HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) deployments to identify potential exposure
- Verify WSGI server versions used in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) deployments
- Consult HCL advisory for remediation guidance
- Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
- Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
Evidence notes
The CVE record indicates HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by the use of a vulnerable WSGI Server. The NVD entry is currently Analyzed. The vulnerability is caused by the use of an outdated or insecure WSGI server, which could potentially increase the risk of exploitation and unauthorized access. Defenders should verify WSGI server versions and assess exposure of HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) deployments.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2025-52613 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52613
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2025-52613 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52613
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.