PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-67101 HCL Software CVE debrief
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in HCL BigFix Service Management's search functionality. This could allow an attacker to force the application server to send requests to internal systems not accessible from the internet. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 9.3, indicating critical severity. Defenders should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. Limited information is available on affected versions and remediation, requiring further investigation from official sources.
- Vendor
- HCL Software
- Product
- HCL BigFix Service Management
- CVSS
- CRITICAL 9.3
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-18
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-21
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-18
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-21
Who should care
Defenders responsible for HCL BigFix Service Management deployments should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. IT security teams and administrators need to verify configurations, monitor for suspicious activity, and implement compensating controls to mitigate potential risks.
Why it matters
The SSRF vulnerability in HCL BigFix Service Management's search functionality could allow attackers to access internal systems. Defenders should verify exposure, implement compensating controls, and monitor for suspicious activity. Remediation details are limited, requiring further investigation from official sources.
- Potential unauthorized access to internal systems
- Possible data breaches or system compromise
- Need for verification of HCL BigFix Service Management configurations and inventory
- Priority for implementing compensating controls and monitoring
Technical summary
The HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its search functionality. This could allow an attacker to force the application server to send requests to internal systems that are not accessible from the internet. The CVSS score is 9.3, indicating a critical severity. The vulnerability's impact and remediation details are limited in the provided sources, requiring further investigation from official sources like the vendor's support article (KB0133782). Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and implementing compensating controls.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure and implementing compensating controls, as the vulnerability's impact and remediation details are limited in the provided sources.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify exposure by reviewing HCL BigFix Service Management configurations and inventory
- Implement compensating controls to restrict internal system access
- Monitor for suspicious search activity
- Review and apply vendor-provided remediation when available
- Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
- Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed
- Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide limited information on affected versions, exploitation, and remediation. The vendor, HCL Software, has provided a reference to a support article (KB0133782) for further information.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-67101 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67101
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-67101 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67101
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.