PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2005-4900 Google CVE debrief
CVE-2005-4900 is a long-standing cryptographic weakness record for SHA-1 rather than a conventional software bug. The issue is that SHA-1 is not collision resistant, which can make certain spoofing attacks easier in contexts that rely on SHA-1 for integrity or identity, including the TLS 1.2 example cited in the CVE description. NVD classifies the weakness as CWE-326 and assigns a CVSS 3.0 score of 5.9 (Medium) with network attack, no privileges, no user interaction, and high attack complexity.
- Vendor
- Product
- Chrome
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.9
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2016-10-14
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-05-06
- Advisory published
- 2016-10-14
- Advisory updated
- 2026-05-06
Who should care
Security teams, PKI/certificate operators, and application owners that still rely on SHA-1 in TLS, signatures, or other collision-sensitive workflows should care most. Because NVD also maps this CVE to Google Chrome versions up to 47.0.2526.111, Chrome maintainers and environments pinned to older Chrome builds should review any SHA-1 dependencies and upgrade paths.
Technical summary
The core technical issue is SHA-1’s broken collision resistance. In collision-sensitive uses, an attacker who can create two inputs with the same digest may be able to spoof or substitute data in a way that preserves the hash value. The CVE description specifically notes attacks against SHA-1 use in TLS 1.2. NVD lists the weakness as CWE-326 and, for Chrome, identifies affected versions through 47.0.2526.111. The recorded CVSS vector is CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N.
Defensive priority
Medium. This is important wherever SHA-1 is still part of trust decisions, but it is not a fresh exploit against a single product release; it is a broader cryptographic deprecation/transition issue with context-dependent impact.
Recommended defensive actions
- Inventory all SHA-1 use in certificates, signatures, integrity checks, and protocol handshakes.
- Replace SHA-1 with collision-resistant alternatives where policy and interoperability allow.
- Review any TLS and PKI configurations that still accept or generate SHA-1-based artifacts.
- Upgrade or retire older Chrome builds if your environment still depends on the affected version range listed by NVD.
- Monitor vendor and standards guidance for SHA-1 deprecation and migration requirements.
Evidence notes
Primary facts come from the CVE/NVD record supplied in the corpus. The CVE description states that SHA-1 is not collision resistant and cites spoofing in TLS 1.2 as an example. NVD maps the weakness to CWE-326, assigns CVSS 3.0 5.9/Medium, and lists Google Chrome as vulnerable through version 47.0.2526.111. Supporting references in the record include shattered.io, Google’s SHA-1 security blog posts, and related third-party advisories. No exploit steps or unverified claims are included.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2005-4900 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-4900
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2005-4900 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4900
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/02/at-deaths-door-for-years-widely-used-sha1-function-is-now-dead/
-
Mitigation or vendor reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://security.googleblog.com/2015/12/an-update-on-sha-1-certificates-in.html
[email protected] - Third Party Advisory
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.