PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2025-15414 go-sonic CVE debrief

A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in go-sonic sonic up to 1.1.4, specifically in the FetchTheme function of the service/theme/git_fetcher.go file. This flaw allows remote attackers to manipulate the uri argument, potentially leading to unauthorized requests. The exploit has been published, and although the vendor was notified, no response was received.

Vendor
go-sonic
Product
sonic
CVSS
LOW 2
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-01-01
Original CVE updated
2026-10-01
Advisory published
2026-01-01
Advisory updated
2026-10-01

Who should care

Defenders responsible for go-sonic sonic deployments should assess exposure and prioritize verification and patching if necessary. This includes operators, platform administrators, vulnerability management teams, and security teams who need to ensure that affected versions are identified and patched. Defenders should also monitor for potential unauthorized requests and review compensating controls for exposed systems. Additionally, asset inventory and risk

Why it matters

CVE-2025-15414 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in go-sonic sonic up to 1.1.4. Defenders should verify exposure, prioritize patching, and monitor for unauthorized requests.

  • Potential unauthorized requests to internal resources.
  • Possible data breaches or system compromise.
  • Need for verification of affected versions and patch application.

Technical summary

The FetchTheme function in go-sonic sonic up to 1.1.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery due to improper handling of the uri argument. This allows remote attackers to manipulate the argument and potentially lead to unauthorized requests. The vulnerability exists in the service/theme/git_fetcher.go file, and defenders should prioritize verifying the affected version and applying patches or mitigations if available. The exploit has been published, and defenders should monitor for unauthorized requests. Additional technical analysis is needed to fully understand the vulnerability and its potential impact.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying the affected version and applying patches or mitigations if available.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify the version of go-sonic sonic and check if it is within the affected range.
  • Apply patches or mitigations if available.
  • Monitor for potential unauthorized requests.
  • Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified.
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review.
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented.
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up.

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD detail page provide information on the vulnerability, but the vendor's response and affected versions require further verification. Defenders should verify the affected version, assess exposure, and prioritize patching if necessary. The exploit has been published, and defenders should monitor for unauthorized requests. Additional verification is needed to confirm affected deployments and ensure proper patching.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2025-15414 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15414

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2025-15414 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15414

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.