PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-58013 GNOME CVE debrief

A buffer over-read vulnerability in GLib's g_io_channel_read_line_backend() function can cause minor information disclosure or denial of service. The flaw occurs when a custom line terminator with a length greater than one is set, allowing memcmp to read past the GString buffer. This issue affects systems using GLib, particularly those with custom line terminator configurations. Defenders managing these systems should assess exposure and prioritize patching. Evidence from official sources, such as Red Hat errata, indicates affected systems and potential fixes.

Vendor
GNOME
Product
GLib
CVSS
MEDIUM 6.5
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-06-30
Original CVE updated
2026-10-29
Advisory published
2026-06-30
Advisory updated
2026-10-29

Who should care

Defenders managing systems using GLib, especially those with custom line terminator configurations, should assess exposure and prioritize patching. Red Hat Enterprise Linux users should review relevant errata for affected systems.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-58013 is a buffer over-read vulnerability in GLib's g_io_channel_read_line_backend() function. Defenders should care because it can cause denial of service or minor information disclosure, particularly in systems using custom line terminators. Affected systems, primarily those using GLib versions prior to 2.88.1, should be identified and patched. Red Hat Enterprise Linux users should review and apply relevant errata. Evidence from official sources is limited, so verification of affected versions and exposure is necessary.

  • Denial of service when buffer over-read crosses a page boundary
  • Minor information disclosure of up to 7 bytes

Technical summary

The g_io_channel_read_line_backend() function in GLib's giochannel.c file has a buffer over-read vulnerability. This occurs when a custom line terminator with a length greater than one is set, causing memcmp to read past the GString buffer. The vulnerability can lead to minor information disclosure of 7 bytes or a denial of service when the buffer over-read crosses a page boundary. Affected systems, primarily those using GLib versions prior to 2.88.1, should be identified and patched. Red Hat Enterprise Linux users should review and apply relevant errata.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying and applying patches for GLib, particularly in systems using custom line terminators. Inventory checks for affected versions and monitoring for potential denial-of-service conditions are recommended.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify and apply GLib patches, especially for custom line terminator usage
  • Conduct inventory checks for affected GLib versions
  • Monitor systems for potential denial-of-service conditions
  • Review compensating controls for exposed systems while remediation is scheduled and verified
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD detail provide information on the vulnerability. Red Hat errata RHSA-2026:49512, RHSA-2026:55440, RHSA-2026:57015, and others reference this CVE, indicating affected systems and potential fixes.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-58013 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58013

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-58013 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-58013

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.