PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-69097 gitpython-developers CVE debrief

GitPython before 3.1.53 fails to properly escape section names in git config files, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary configuration directives through malicious submodule names. This vulnerability enables attackers to inject core.sshCommand or other dangerous config keys into the victim's .git/config via create_submodule or clone_from operations, achieving remote code execution when git performs ssh operations. The vulnerability affects users of GitPython, especially those using versions prior to 3.1.53. Evidence is limited; primary official records indicate a remote code execution vulnerability in GitPython before 3.1.53 due to improper escaping of section names in git config files. Limited source detail suggests verifying affected GitPython installations, reviewing official advisories, and monitoring git operations for potential suspicious activity related to submodule names and git config files.

Vendor
gitpython-developers
Product
GitPython
CVSS
HIGH 7.3
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-03
Original CVE updated
2026-09-16
Advisory published
2026-08-03
Advisory updated
2026-09-16

Who should care

Users of GitPython, especially those using versions prior to 3.1.53, should be aware of this vulnerability and take defensive actions to prevent exploitation. This includes administrators of systems using GitPython, security teams responsible for vulnerability management, and developers using GitPython in their projects. Affected operators should review official advisories and take steps to protect their systems.

Technical summary

GitPython before 3.1.53 is vulnerable to remote code execution due to improper escaping of section names in git config files, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary configuration directives through malicious submodule names. This vulnerability affects users of GitPython, especially those using versions prior to 3.1.53. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject core.sshCommand or other dangerous config keys into the victim's .git/config via create_submodule or clone_from operations.

Defensive priority

High-priority defensive actions are required to address the remote code execution vulnerability in GitPython.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Inventory and assess GitPython installations for version 3.1.53 or later
  • Implement compensating controls, such as restrictive git config permissions
  • Monitor git operations for suspicious activity
  • Apply vendor remediation when available
  • Review official advisories for affected scope and severity
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments
  • Track exceptions and retest remediated assets

Evidence notes

GitPython before 3.1.53 fails to properly escape section names in git config files, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary configuration directives through malicious submodule names. Evidence is limited; primary official records indicate a remote code execution vulnerability in GitPython before 3.1.53 due to improper escaping of section names in git config files. Limited source detail suggests verifying affected GitPython installations, reviewing official advisories, and monitoring git operations for potential suspicious activity related to submodule names and git config files.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-69097 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69097

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-69097 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69097

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.