PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-51994 geelen CVE debrief

A critical vulnerability was found in mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38, which are susceptible to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resource_metadata URL extracted from a remote MCP server's WWW-Authenticate header. This issue has a CVSS score of 9.1 and is considered critical. The vulnerability allows attackers to make unauthorized requests, potentially leading to significant operational impacts. Defenders must verify mcp-remote versions to determine exposure and prioritize verification of versions in use. They should also implement compensating controls to prevent SSRF attacks.

Vendor
geelen
Product
mcp-remote
CVSS
CRITICAL 9.1
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-09-24
Original CVE updated
2026-09-25
Advisory published
2026-09-24
Advisory updated
2026-09-25

Who should care

Defenders responsible for mcp-remote deployments should assess exposure and prioritize verification of versions in use. They should also implement compensating controls to prevent SSRF attacks and monitor for potential exploitation attempts. Security teams should review relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review. Asset inventory and vulnerability management teams should track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and

Why it matters

CVE-2026-51994 is a critical SSRF vulnerability in mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38, allowing attackers to make unauthorized requests. Defenders should prioritize verification of versions in use and implement compensating controls to prevent SSRF attacks.

  • Defenders must verify mcp-remote versions to determine exposure
  • SSRF attacks could lead to unauthorized requests

Technical summary

mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resource_metadata URL extracted from a remote MCP server's WWW-Authenticate header. This vulnerability allows attackers to make unauthorized requests, potentially leading to significant operational impacts. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 9.1 and is considered critical. Defenders should prioritize verifying the versions of mcp-remote in use and assessing exposure to SSRF attacks. They should also implement compensating controls to prevent SSRF attacks.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying the versions of mcp-remote in use and assessing exposure to SSRF attacks.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify mcp-remote versions in use and assess exposure to SSRF attacks
  • Implement compensating controls to prevent SSRF attacks
  • Monitor for potential exploitation attempts
  • Review relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details about the vulnerability, but additional information from other sources may be necessary to fully understand the impact. The vulnerability is confirmed in mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38. Defenders should verify the versions in use and assess exposure to SSRF attacks. Evidence of exploitation attempts should be monitored, and compensating controls should be implemented to prevent SSRF attacks.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-51994 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-51994

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-51994 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-51994

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.