PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2016-8859 Etalabs CVE debrief
CVE-2016-8859 is a critical memory-corruption vulnerability involving integer overflows that can lead to out-of-bounds writes. The CVE description identifies TRE library and musl libc as affected components, and NVD’s CPE data specifically lists musl libc through 1.1.15 as vulnerable. Because the attack vector is network-based with no privileges or user interaction required in the supplied NVD vector, this issue should be treated as high priority wherever affected musl builds are deployed.
- Vendor
- Etalabs
- Product
- Musl
- CVSS
- CRITICAL 9.8
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2017-02-13
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-05-13
- Advisory published
- 2017-02-13
- Advisory updated
- 2026-05-13
Who should care
System administrators, Linux distribution maintainers, application teams that ship or statically link musl libc, and security teams responsible for embedded or minimal Linux environments should prioritize this CVE. Operators using musl libc at or below 1.1.15 should consider themselves directly in scope based on the supplied NVD data.
Technical summary
The supplied NVD record describes multiple integer overflows that can trigger an out-of-bounds write and memory corruption. The weakness is classified as CWE-190. NVD’s CVSS vector indicates a remote, low-complexity attack path with no privileges or user interaction required, and with potential impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The supplied CPE criteria mark musl libc versions up to 1.1.15 as vulnerable.
Defensive priority
Critical. The combination of remote reachability, no authentication, no user interaction, and memory corruption potential warrants immediate inventory, version checks, and remediation planning for any affected musl deployments.
Recommended defensive actions
- Identify systems, containers, images, and embedded builds that use musl libc and verify whether they are at or below version 1.1.15.
- Review vendor advisories and downstream distribution guidance linked in the supplied references for package-specific fixes or backports.
- Prioritize patching or upgrading affected musl-based systems, especially internet-facing services and infrastructure that process untrusted input.
- Rebuild affected software stacks after remediation to ensure linked libraries and container layers are updated consistently.
- If you cannot patch immediately, reduce exposure of affected services and monitor for abnormal crashes or memory-corruption symptoms while remediation is underway.
Evidence notes
This debrief is based only on the supplied NVD/CVE corpus and linked references. The CVE description states that TRE library and musl libc are affected by multiple integer overflows leading to memory corruption via out-of-bounds write. NVD’s cpe criteria specifically list cpe:2.3:a:etalabs:musl:* with vulnerability through version 1.1.15. The supplied CVSS vector is CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, and the weakness is CWE-190. References include the official CVE record, NVD detail page, openSUSE security announcement, Gentoo GLSA entries, an oss-security mailing list discussion, and a SecurityFocus advisory entry.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2016-8859 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8859
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2016-8859 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8859
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-11
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-43
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.