PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-82278 dataelement CVE debrief

CVE-2026-82278 is a high-severity vulnerability in BISHENG, a workflow management system, which allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code via the workflow run_once endpoint. The vulnerability exists due to the lack of sandboxing when executing Code node definitions submitted through the POST /api/v1/workflow/run_once endpoint. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to gain access to filesystem, credentials, and internal network resources.

Vendor
dataelement
Product
bisheng
CVSS
HIGH 8.7
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-28
Original CVE updated
2026-09-23
Advisory published
2026-08-28
Advisory updated
2026-09-23

Who should care

Defenders responsible for BISHENG installations, especially those with authenticated user access to workflow management features, should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. Security teams and administrators managing workflow systems should verify BISHENG versions, restrict access to vulnerable endpoints, and monitor for suspicious activities.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-82278 is a high-severity vulnerability allowing authenticated users to execute arbitrary Python code in BISHENG workflow systems. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure, restricting access to vulnerable endpoints, and monitoring for suspicious activities. The vulnerability's impact requires immediate attention from security teams and administrators managing BISHENG installations.

  • Potential unauthorized access to filesystem resources
  • Possible credential exposure or misuse
  • Potential lateral movement within internal networks
  • Need for verification of BISHENG version and exposure

Technical summary

The BISHENG workflow management system, prior to version 2.6.0, contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the workflow run_once endpoint. Authenticated users can submit crafted Code node definitions to the POST /api/v1/workflow/run_once endpoint, which executes them with exec() without sandboxing. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary Python code, potentially gaining access to filesystem, credentials, and internal network resources.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of BISHENG installations, especially those with authenticated user access to workflow management features. Immediate actions include reviewing and restricting access to the run_once endpoint, ensuring BISHENG is updated to version 2.6.0 or later, and monitoring for suspicious workflow activities.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify BISHENG version and update to 2.6.0 or later if necessary
  • Restrict access to the run_once endpoint
  • Monitor workflow activities for suspicious behavior
  • Review and enforce secure coding practices for workflow node definitions
  • Perform vulnerability scanning to identify exposed BISHENG installations
  • Implement additional logging and monitoring for workflow management features
  • Review incident response plans for potential exploitation of BISHENG vulnerabilities

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability, including its CVSS score of 8.7 and the affected endpoint. However, specific details about exploitation or victim impact are not provided in the source corpus.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-82278 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82278

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-82278 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82278

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.