PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2025-15449 cld378632668 CVE debrief
A vulnerability was determined in cld378632668 JavaMall up to 994f1e2b019378ec9444cdf3fce2d5b5f72d28f0. Affected is the function delete of the file src/main/java/com/macro/mall/controller/MinioController.java. This manipulation of the argument objectName causes path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available.
- Vendor
- cld378632668
- Product
- JavaMall
- CVSS
- MEDIUM 5.3
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in stored evidence
- Original CVE published
- 2026-01-05
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-30
- Advisory published
- 2026-01-05
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-30
Who should care
Defenders responsible for JavaMall deployments should assess exposure and prioritize verification of the vulnerable component in their inventory, as the product's continuous delivery model makes version identification challenging.
Why it matters
CVE-2025-15449 is a path traversal vulnerability in JavaMall's MinioController.java. Defenders should verify inventory, assess exposure, and consider compensating controls. Continuous delivery model limits version identification.
- Verify inventory for vulnerable JavaMall component.
- Assess exposure to path traversal vulnerability.
- Consider compensating controls for affected function.
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts.
Technical summary
The vulnerability is located in the delete function of the MinioController.java file in JavaMall. An attacker can remotely initiate an attack by manipulating the objectName argument, leading to path traversal. This issue arises in JavaMall up to version 994f1e2b019378ec9444cdf3fce2d5b5f72d28f0, affecting the function delete in src/main/java/com/macro/mall/controller/MinioController.java. The product uses continuous delivery with rolling releases, making version identification and patching challenging. Defenders should focus on verifying inventory, assessing exposure, and implementing compensating controls.
Defensive priority
Defenders should prioritize verifying the presence of the vulnerable component in their inventory and assessing exposure, as the product uses continuous delivery with rolling releases, making version identification challenging.
Recommended defensive actions
- Verify the presence of the vulnerable component in your inventory.
- Assess exposure to the path traversal vulnerability in MinioController.java.
- Consider compensating controls, such as restricting access to the affected function.
- Monitor for potential exploitation attempts.
- Review vendor guidance for patching or mitigating the vulnerability.
- Conduct a thorough review of system logs for signs of exploitation.
- Prioritize asset inventory management to ensure accurate tracking of affected components.
Evidence notes
The CVE record and NVD entry provide details about the vulnerability, including its description, CVSS score, and affected product. However, due to the continuous delivery model, specific version details are not available.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2025-15449 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15449
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2025-15449 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15449
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
Supplemental references
-
Source reference
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://github.com/zyhzheng500-maker/cve/blob/main/JavaMall%E4%BB%BB%E6%84%8F%E6%96%87%E4%BB%B6%E5%88%A0%E9%99%A4.md
[email protected] - Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.