PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief
CVE-2026-76461 Cisco CVE debrief
Cisco Secure Email Gateway contains a SQL injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious SQL code, potentially leading to unauthorized access, data tampering, or other malicious activities. Defenders responsible for Cisco Secure Email Gateway systems, particularly those exposed to the internet or critical infrastructure, should assess exposure and prioritize mitigation. The vulnerability's specific details, such as affected versions and exploitation methods, are limited. Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability debrief expanded to provide executive overview.
- Vendor
- Cisco
- Product
- Secure Email Gateway
- CVSS
- CRITICAL 9.8
- CISA KEV
- Listed
- Original CVE published
- 2026-09-14
- Original CVE updated
- 2026-09-14
- Advisory published
- 2026-09-14
- Advisory updated
- 2026-09-14
Who should care
Defenders responsible for Cisco Secure Email Gateway systems, particularly those exposed to the internet or critical infrastructure, should assess exposure and prioritize mitigation. This includes evaluating asset internet exposure and adhering to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines. System administrators, cybersecurity teams, and IT professionals managing Cisco Secure Email Gateway should be aware of this vulnerability's
Why it matters
CVE-2026-76461 is a SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Defenders should assess exposure, prioritize patching, and ensure compliance with CISA guidance due to potential for exploitation and data impact.
- Potential for SQL injection attacks
- Need for urgent patching and mitigation
- Possible data tampering or unauthorized access
- Compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 guidance
Technical summary
Cisco Secure Email Gateway is vulnerable to SQL injection, which could allow an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. This vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-76461, affects Cisco Secure Email Gateway and could lead to potential SQL injection attacks, necessitating urgent patching and mitigation. The vulnerability's specific details, such as affected versions and exploitation methods, are limited. However, defenders should assess exposure, prioritize patching, and ensure compliance with CISA guidance due to potential for exploitation and data impact. Technical
Defensive priority
High priority for defenders due to potential SQL injection vulnerability
Recommended defensive actions
- Review and apply mitigations in accordance with Cisco instructions
- Ensure compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 guidance
- Evaluate asset internet exposure and adhere to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines
Evidence notes
Evidence from CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and Cisco indicates a SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Secure Email Gateway, but specific details are limited.
Sources and references
Verified primary and authoritative sources
-
CVE-2026-76461 CVE Program record
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-76461
CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.
-
CVE-2026-76461 NVD vulnerability detail
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-76461
NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.
-
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency - Official CISA catalog of vulnerabilities known to be exploited in the wild.
Supplemental references
-
Cisco Secure Email Gateway Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection Vulnerability
Unverified legacy reference
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json
cisa_kev
Methodology and review provenance
AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.