PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-78250 bytebot-ai CVE debrief

CVE-2026-78250 is a vulnerability in bytebot-ai bytebot 0.0.1, specifically in an unknown function of the Agent Execution Workflow, leading to an infinite loop. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 2.1 and is considered low severity. The attack may be performed remotely, and the exploit is publicly available. However, this vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Vendor
bytebot-ai
Product
bytebot
CVSS
LOW 2.1
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-24
Original CVE updated
2026-10-12
Advisory published
2026-08-24
Advisory updated
2026-10-12

Who should care

Defenders responsible for systems using bytebot-ai bytebot 0.0.1 should assess their exposure to remote attacks and verify if their deployment is affected. This includes operators, platform administrators, vulnerability management teams, and security teams who need to prioritize verifying if they are using the affected version and assess if their deployment is exposed to remote attacks.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-78250 is a low-severity vulnerability in bytebot-ai bytebot 0.0.1 that can lead to an infinite loop. Defenders should prioritize verifying if they are using the affected version and assess their exposure to remote attacks.

  • Verify if the affected version of bytebot-ai bytebot is in use
  • Assess if the deployment is exposed to remote attacks
  • Consider compensating controls or monitoring for potential exploitation attempts

Technical summary

The vulnerability is in an unknown function of the Agent Execution Workflow in bytebot-ai bytebot 0.0.1, leading to an infinite loop. The attack may be performed remotely, and the exploit is publicly available. Defenders should prioritize verifying if they are using the affected version of bytebot-ai bytebot and assess if their deployment is exposed to remote attacks with source-grounded technical framing without unsupported root-cause or exploit claims. The affected product context requires defensive impact assessment.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying if they are using the affected version of bytebot-ai bytebot and assess if their deployment is exposed to remote attacks.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify if the affected version of bytebot-ai bytebot is in use
  • Assess if the deployment is exposed to remote attacks
  • Consider compensating controls or monitoring for potential exploitation attempts
  • Review the supplied official advisory or CVE record to validate affected scope, severity, and vendor guidance
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide limited information about the vulnerability. The exploit is publicly available, but there is no information on actual exploitation or victims. Defenders should verify if they are using the affected version of bytebot-ai bytebot and assess if their deployment is exposed to remote attacks with explicit evidence-limit language.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-78250 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-78250

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-78250 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78250

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.