PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2026-7455 Autodesk CVE debrief

A maliciously crafted FLT file can cause an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max, potentially leading to a crash, data corruption, or code execution. This CVE was published on 2026-08-24T21:17:49.040Z and was last modified on 2026-10-12T15:10:00.207Z. The NVD entry is currently Analyzed. Defenders should assess exposure and verify system versions. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.8 and is considered HIGH severity. The CVE description and NVD detail provide information on the Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max.

Vendor
Autodesk
Product
3ds Max
CVSS
HIGH 7.8
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-08-24
Original CVE updated
2026-10-12
Advisory published
2026-08-24
Advisory updated
2026-10-12

Who should care

Defenders responsible for Autodesk 3ds Max systems, particularly those handling FLT files, should assess exposure and verify system versions. Data corruption or crash risks require verification and potential remediation.

Why it matters

CVE-2026-7455 is a HIGH-severity vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max that could lead to data corruption, crashes, or code execution from malicious FLT files. Defenders should verify exposure, assess risks, and prioritize remediation based on affected versions and vendor patches.

  • Verify 3ds Max version exposure to FLT file parsing issues
  • Assess data corruption risks from malicious FLT files
  • Evaluate system crash potential from Out-of-Bounds Write

Technical summary

The CVE-2026-7455 vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max allows for an Out-of-Bounds Write when parsing maliciously crafted FLT files. This could lead to a crash, data corruption, or potentially code execution in the context of the current process. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.8 and is considered HIGH severity. The CVE description and NVD detail provide information on the Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max. Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of 3ds Max systems to FLT file parsing and assessing data corruption or crash risks.

Defensive priority

Defenders should prioritize verifying exposure of 3ds Max systems to FLT file parsing and assessing data corruption or crash risks. Remediation priority follows from verifying affected versions and applying vendor patches.

Recommended defensive actions

  • Verify 3ds Max systems are updated to a version not vulnerable to FLT file parsing issues
  • Assess data corruption or crash risks from FLT file parsing
  • Implement compensating controls to limit FLT file parsing exposure
  • Review relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up
  • Plan vendor-supported updates or mitigations through normal change control where exposure is confirmed

Evidence notes

The CVE description and NVD detail provide information on the Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability in Autodesk 3ds Max. The vendor advisory and product overview offer additional context. Evidence is limited to public sources and may not reflect the full scope of affected systems or potential impacts. Defenders should verify exposure and assess risks based on available information.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2026-7455 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7455

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2026-7455 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7455

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.