PatchSiren

PatchSiren cyber security CVE debrief

CVE-2025-69229 aio-libs CVE debrief

CVE-2025-69229 AIOHTTP excessive blocking CPU usage. AIOHTTP versions 3.13.2 and below are vulnerable to excessive blocking CPU usage when handling chunked messages. This can lead to potential DoS attacks if an attacker causes the server to spend a moderate amount of blocking CPU time while processing a request. Defenders and administrators of AIOHTTP deployments should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. The vulnerability can lead to moderate blocking CPU time, impacting server performance and availability.

Vendor
aio-libs
Product
aiohttp
CVSS
MEDIUM 6.6
CISA KEV
Not listed in stored evidence
Original CVE published
2026-01-06
Original CVE updated
2026-09-30
Advisory published
2026-01-06
Advisory updated
2026-09-30

Who should care

Defenders and administrators of AIOHTTP deployments should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. This vulnerability may impact server performance and availability. Operators, platform administrators, and security teams should review the vulnerability and take necessary actions to mitigate the risk.

Why it matters

CVE-2025-69229 AIOHTTP excessive blocking CPU usage requires defenders to assess exposure, prioritize remediation, and monitor for potential DoS attacks. The vulnerability can lead to moderate blocking CPU time, impacting server performance and availability.

  • Potential for DoS attacks due to excessive blocking CPU usage
  • Moderate blocking CPU time (e.g., 1 second) while processing requests
  • Server inability to handle other requests during vulnerable processing time
  • Verification of patch application and server configuration adjustments may be necessary

Technical summary

AIOHTTP versions 3.13.2 and below are vulnerable to excessive blocking CPU usage when handling chunked messages. This can lead to potential DoS attacks if an attacker causes the server to spend a moderate amount of blocking CPU time while processing a request. The vulnerability was fixed in version 3.13.3. Defenders should assess exposure and prioritize remediation. The vulnerability can lead to moderate blocking CPU time, impacting server performance and availability. The CVE record and NVD entry provide additional information on the vulnerability.

Defensive priority

Medium

Recommended defensive actions

  • Review and apply the patch to upgrade to version 3.13.3 or later
  • Assess exposure and prioritize remediation for affected deployments
  • Monitor for potential DoS attacks and adjust server configurations as needed
  • Verify patch application and server configuration adjustments
  • Check relevant monitoring, detection, and logs for exposed assets that need extra review
  • Track exceptions, retest remediated assets, and close the item only after evidence is documented
  • Confirm whether affected product deployments exist in managed environments and assign an owner for follow-up

Evidence notes

The CVE record and NVD entry provide details on the vulnerability. The NVD entry is currently Analyzed. The vulnerability was fixed in version 3.13.3. Defenders should verify patch application and server configuration adjustments. The CVE record was published on 2026-01-06T00:15:48.347Z and has not been modified since then. The NVD entry provides additional information on the vulnerability.

Sources and references

Verified primary and authoritative sources

  • CVE-2025-69229 CVE Program record

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69229

    CVE Program - Official CVE Program record with source-provided CVE metadata.

  • CVE-2025-69229 NVD vulnerability detail

    Publisher, destination, and source semantics verified

    URL: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69229

    NIST National Vulnerability Database - Official NIST NVD detail page and source-specific vulnerability assessment.

Supplemental references

Methodology and review provenance

AI-assisted synthesis based on stored public vulnerability evidence. System validation, approval state, and publication status do not by themselves establish human review of this revision. PatchSiren helps prioritize defensive review and does not prove exposure or remediation on any system.